Mar 28, 2024  
2010-2011 Academic Catalog 
    
2010-2011 Academic Catalog [Published Catalog]

Applied Sciences (Ph.D.)


Return to {$returnto_text} Return to: Schools

Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Sciences

The Ph.D. in Applied Sciences is an interdisciplinary program that applies modern approaches from the experimental, natural and life sciences in conjunction with theoretical and computational methods from the disciplines of engineering, mathematics and computer science to the solution of advanced problems of fundamental importance. The Ph.D. program in Applied Sciences emphasizes the application of research methods and procedures to advanced areas of importance in the sciences and technology. The program builds on the premise that advancing the applied sciences and technology must be based on fundamental comprehension of the various disciplines, while continually being responsive to the needs of new technologies, and the interdisciplinary nature of the modern scientific enterprise. This program will be administered by the Doctoral Program Steering Committee which has a representation of one faculty from the various departments in the School of Sciences and Engineering.

This program offers a Ph.D. degree in Applied Sciences with specializations in Nanotechnology, Biotechnology or Computer Science.

Admission Requirements

  • M.Sc. in an Engineering or Science discipline
  • Demonstrated proficiency in English language as determined by AUC graduate admissions
  • Obtain an acceptable score in the Graduate Record Exam (GRE)

 

Program Objectives

The mission of the Ph.D. program in Applied Sciences and Engineering is to provide in-depth training to students in the natural sciences, modern engineering, and computer science and in the conduct of original research leading to a doctoral dissertation.

The primary goal of the program is to provide students with an opportunity to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of applied sciences and engineering. The program is aimed at providing students with the opportunity to develop their professional knowledge and expertise to a high caliber and to qualify for leadership positions in teaching, in research, in administration and management and in policy analysis and program development. The program caters to demands of industry and research institutes and places a strong emphasis on original thinking, professional behavior and ethical conduct. The objectives of the program are for students to acquire

  1. A broad analytic understanding of advanced experimental, theoretical and computational methods in the applied sciences and engineering
  2. Substantive knowledge of some field or area of practice (e.g., nanotechnology, biotechnology, computer science, environmental engineering, etc.).
  3. Competence to conduct independent, empirical research that extends the knowledge base of the field of interest.
  4. Ability to generate new ideas, convince others that their ideas are worth pursuing, do the necessary research to demonstrate that their ideas are viable, and communicate the results of their research in the public domain.

 

Program Outcomes

Upon completing the degree requirements for the Ph.D. Program in Applied Sciences and Engineering graduating students should have the ability to:

  1. Pursue a career in academia in teaching and/or research.
  2. Pursue a career in industrial research and development (R&D).
  3. Identify well-defined science and/or engineering problems of importance to the profession or the community, as well as generate new ideas and approaches to resolve such problems.
  4. Apply advanced experimental, analytical and computational techniques to solve complex science problems.
  5. Convince others that their ideas are worth pursuing and explore funding opportunities for their research.
  6. Initiate scientific collaborations schemes that advance their research endeavors.
  7. Successfully communicate their results to constituencies of various technical backgrounds and fields of specialty.
  8. Make significant contributions to their field of specialization and profession through their own continued research, writing, teaching, and practice.
  9. Implement the code of ethics within the study and work environments.

 

Doctoral of Philosophy Degree Requirements:

Doctoral qualification decisions are made by the Doctoral Program Steering Committee. Students going through this program are expected to successfully complete the following requirements:

  1. Pass the required course work with a GPA 3.0 or higher: This insures the breadth of knowledge of the Ph.D. student.
  2. Pass a Qualifying Examination: This signifies that course work is completed and that the student has sufficient background knowledge in her/his field of specialization.
  3. Present and defend a proposal of the intended research work: This demonstrates that the candidate has defined her/his research problem and is capable of identifying the research methodology that she/he will adopt.
  4. Submit a written Dissertation and defend it in a final Oral Defense: This marks the completion of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

 

Doctoral Coursework:

As part of the process of achieving candidacy, a doctoral student must complete a set of courses known as the doctoral candidacy coursework. It includes at least thirty-six (36) credit hours of relevant graduate coursework beyond the bachelor’s degree, of which at least eighteen (18) credit hours must be earned at AUC. Students who change their major track from that used for their master’s degree to a new track for their Ph.D. degree may have to take more than thirty-six (36) hours to fulfill the course requirements. Because of the interdisciplinary nature of the program and in order to ensure sufficient breadth of study, doctoral students must include in the program of study at least one graduate course for a minimum of 3 hours of credit in areas outside one’s main track. In addition the student must complete 3 credit hours of Seminar courses and register for thirty-three (33) credit hours of Dissertation research work. Courses for each track will be listed at the 500 and 600 levels in addition to remedial courses to be taken at the 400 level whenever deemed necessary.

The Academic Advisor and the Research Advising Committee:

The academic advisor is determined by the major track of the student, and is particularly important for assistance in the preliminary course planning of a student’s Ph.D. program. Each major track has at least one faculty member advisor to be identified by the Doctoral Program Steering Committee (usually the Graduate Program Director of the discipline). The academic advisor will be available to the student to help in her/his preliminary choice of the courses. As the student progresses in the program she/he chooses the members of the Research Advising Committee, which consists of the Chair of the Committee (Dissertation Advisor) and two other members. This committee will play a greater role in finalizing the courses for the student’s Plan of Study and in advising her/his research work. It is the responsibility of the student to find a faculty member willing to serve as the Chair of the Research Advising Committee and to choose in consultation with her/him the other members. In most cases the Chair of the Committee will eventually become the dissertation advisor.

Ph.D. Plan of Study for Qualification and Candidacy:

The Ph.D. Plan of Study is intended to help the student select courses and will ensure that she/he has an academic program that meets the Ph.D. coursework requirements. The Plan of Study will also allow the student to identify a sequence of courses that meets her/his professional objectives. A preliminary Plan of Study will be drafted in consultation with the student’s academic advisor and should be submitted before the student signs up to take the Ph.D. Qualifying Examination.

As the student advances in the program, she/he should choose the members of her/his Research Advising Committee. The final Plan of Study will be drafted in consultation with the Research Advising Committee. A final up-to-date copy must be submitted before the student applies for Candidacy.

The Plan of Study must contain a listing of the courses the student has taken or intends to take to satisfy the qualification coursework requirements and must constitute a coherent program within the scope of the chosen track. It is the student’s responsibility to make sure that all requirements are met. Any departure from the requirements must be requested by written petition to be approved by the Doctoral Program Steering Committee.

Doctoral Qualifying Examination:

The purpose of the Ph.D. Qualifying Examination is to evaluate the student’s ability to analyze problems and to synthesize solutions. It should demonstrate the ability of the student to interrelate basic concepts and ideas in her/his field of study. At least twelve (12) weeks prior to the examination, the student must submit a request indicating her/his intention to take the examination. The Ph.D. Qualifying Examination will be administered by an Examining Committee consisting of the Research Advising Committee in addition to two other examiners to be identified by the Doctoral Program Steering Committee. Following the examination, the Examining Committee will submit an evaluation of the student’s performance to the Doctoral Program Steering Committee.

The Doctoral Candidacy and the Thesis Proposal Presentation:

To proceed towards the Ph.D. Candidacy the student has to write a thesis research proposal under the guidance of the Dissertation Advisor and will give a Thesis Proposal Presentation in front of the Research Advising Committee. Upon the acceptance of the proposal by the Research Advising Committee, the student makes an oral presentation of the thesis research proposal, including relevant background material. During and after the presentation, the committee will explore the research project with the student in order to provide guidance and make an evaluation of its suitability. They will report their recommendation to the Doctoral Program Steering Committee. In case the student does not present an acceptable proposal, the student must take immediate steps to refine the proposal in consultation with the chair and other committee members. The Thesis Proposal Presentation requirement is completed when the Research Advising Committee chair reports a successful proposal presentation to the Office of the Registrar.

Following acceptance of the thesis proposal, the Dissertation Defense Committee is finalized. This usually consists of the three members of the Research Advising Committee in addition to two external examiners. The student should submit a written request to the Doctoral Program Steering Committee to approve the proposed Dissertation Defense Committee. The membership of this Committee is communicated to the SSE Dean and the AUC Director of the Office of Graduate Studies and Research for approval.

The Dissertation and Its Defense — Final Oral Defense:

Upon completion, the dissertation must receive a written evaluation from each member of the Dissertation Defense Committee and must be defended orally in an open examination before the committee. Following the successful Final Oral Defense, the student must consult with the dissertation advisor(s) about any changes required by the committee, and must make these changes before final submission of the thesis to the AUC Director of the Office of Graduate Studies and Research.

Course and Research Requirements

Minimum number of credit hours beyond the B.Sc. degree: 72

Dissertation hours   33 (BIOT 699, NANO 699, CSCE 699)

Seminar hours          3

Course hours          36 (See below)

The required number of semester credit hours of coursework to be taken for the Ph.D. degree is dependent upon the M.Sc. degree and is determined by the academic advisor of the student at the time of admission.

Case 1:   M.Sc. in the same Applied Sciences discipline

                A candidate may receive up to 24 hours of credit to be counted towards the Ph.D. degree

Case 2:   M.Sc. in a different Applied Science discipline

                A candidate may receive up to 12 hours of credit to be counted towards the Ph.D. degree

 

A plan of study will be developed under guidance of the academic advisor of the student at the time of admission and may be modified later on by her/his Research Advising Committee. Courses are to be selected from the following:

II- Applied Sciences Specialization courses


Dependant on the admission status the student may take the following number of credit hours from the listed of courses. At least one course should be a 600-level course

  • Admission Case 1: at least 6 credit hours (2 courses)
  • Admission Case 2: at least 12 credit hours (4 courses)

All master’s 500-level courses offered by the following graduate programs: Biotechnology (BIOT), Chemistry (CHEM), Computer Science (CSCE), Nanotechnology (NANO) and Physics (PHYS). In addition, the students should take at least one 600-level course from the following list:

III- Interdisciplinary Course Requirement


 To ensure sufficient breadth of study, students must include in their program of study at least one graduate course for a minimum of 3 hours of credit in areas outside their specialization.

IV- Dissertation (Minimum of 36 credit hours)


Dissertation work includes completion of:

  • Graduate Thesis Seminar I, 2 cr.
  • Graduate Thesis Seminar II, 1 cr.

Research Guidance Dissertation, a minimum of 33 cr. (BIOT 699, CSCE 699, or NANO 699)

To achieve the Ph.D. Candidacy the student has to write a thesis research proposal under the guidance of the Dissertation Advisor and will give a Thesis Proposal Presentation in front of the Research Advising Committee. Upon the acceptance of the proposal by the Research Advising Committee, the student makes an oral presentation of the thesis research proposal, including relevant background material. The Research Advising Committee will report their recommendation to the Doctoral Program Steering Committee. In case the student does not present an acceptable proposal, the student must take immediate steps to refine the proposal in consultation with the chair and other committee members. The Thesis Proposal Presentation requirement is completed when the Research Advising Committee chair reports a successful proposal presentation to the Office of the Registrar.

Following acceptance of the thesis proposal, the Dissertation Defense Committee is formed from the three members of the Research Advising Committee in addition to two external examiners. The student should submit a written request to the Doctoral Program Steering Committee to approve the proposed Dissertation Defense Committee. The membership of this Committee is communicated to the SSE Dean and the AUC Director of the Office of Graduate Studies and Research for approval.

Upon completion, the dissertation must receive a written evaluation from each member of the Dissertation Defense Committee and must be defended orally in an open examination before the committee. Following the successful Final Oral Defense, the student must consult with the dissertation advisor(s) about any changes required by the committee, and must make these changes before final submission of the thesis to the AUC Director of the Office of Graduate Studies and Research.

Return to {$returnto_text} Return to: Schools